Donald Trump and the Lack of Media Accountability

Posted on 04/14/2016 @ 12:45 AM

Tags: blog

Photo Credit: Dominick Reuter/Reuters

By: Mark Salay, LULAC National Communications Intern

Donald Trump has held a monopoly on the media since announcing his presidential campaign with an onslaught of gross lies targeting minority communities. Coverage of Trump has spiraled out of control, but the media has been the enabler in normalizing Trump’s campaign of hate by putting aside its core duty of holding public figures accountable for their actions.

Last November, in one of the biggest examples of free media attention given to a presidential candidate, Saturday Night Live invited Trump to host despite loud opposition from protesters, including LULAC. SNL is known for having politicians appear on the show during election season; however, having a presidential candidate serving as host during election season is a rarity.

It was an insult to the more than 50 million Latinos in this country that such an iconic program would sell out for the sake of a few cheap laughs, considering NBCUniversal previously announced they would break business ties with Trump right after he labeled Mexicans as rapists, criminals, and drug dealers.

Whether the coverage is satirical or serious, the media -- television, radio, newspapers and magazines, and online -- has been more than happy to play along with Trump’s joke by constantly expanding coverage of him. Soundbites of him scapegoating Latinos and other minorities are on constant rotation, followed by more soundbites of him insulting the disabled, women, and veterans.

More Trump equals more ads sold, higher ratings, and more story clicks. But by promoting wall-to-wall Trump coverage, the media has profited greatly at the expense of minorities and other underrepresented groups.

CBS CEO Leslie Moonves commented on the race in February by confirming how the media has prioritized profit in its Trump coverage, “Who would have thought that this circus would come to town? But, you know -- it may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS, that’s all I got to say. So what can I say? It’s -- you know, the money’s rolling in, and this is fun.”

But for many of the groups targeted by Trump, this is not fun. This is dangerous. In addition to scapegoating minority groups, Trump actively encourages his supporters to use violence against protesters.

The result is widespread violence at Trump rallies. Protesters are getting sucker punched, a teenager was pepper-sprayed, and an African American woman was shoved back and forth by a group of individuals. Instances of verbal abuse by supporters is another example of hate at his rallies, with one instance of a man yelling at black protesters, “Go back to Africa”.

A Trump rally in March scheduled to take place at the University of Illinois at Chicago, a school with nearly 25 percent Latino students, was called off after students of the university began a petition to cancel the event. Students cited safety concerns because of Trump’s statements and outbreaks of violence at Trump rallies that were often directed at protesters.

“As an undocumented UIC graduate student, I feel unsafe knowing that Trump along with his followers will be at my university,” wrote Jorge Mena Robles, the creator of the petition. “It’s become clear that his rallies are not just political events but mobilizing moments for active hate groups to amass.”

Despite outbreaks of violence incited by Trump and his supporters, Trump continues to not only dominate the media, but also dictate the terms. When Fox News turned down Trump’s request to change moderators for the last GOP debate before the Iowa caucuses in February, Trump decided to skip the debate. The message was clear that Trump would only allow access if he was able to control the narrative. It wasn’t until last month that NBC’s Sunday morning news program Meet the Press finally stopped allowing Trump to call in by phone, a practice used by him throughout his campaign to dodge questions and maintain control over the conversation. Sunday morning programs have conducted at least 28 phone interviews with him, a privilege not given to other candidates.

But why didn’t this happen earlier? Why has it taken this long for the media to hold him accountable?

Even as Trump has endured more recent criticism from the press (he has come under severe scrutiny for saying women deserve to be punished if they choose to have an abortion), it is still not enough to deter him. Any coverage of him must address his unrealistic policies and the effects of his dangerous rhetoric, instead of the current sensational coverage that merely legitimizes his opinions for large segments of the American public Trump was created by the media, and now it’s their responsibility to pull the plug and dump Trump.

Mark Salay is the Communications Intern at the LULAC National Office in Washington, D.C. He is a senior at the University of California, Santa Barbara, majoring in communication with minors in history and professional writing, and will be graduating in the Spring of 2016.

The Clock is Ticking on Puerto Rico’s Debt

Posted on 04/12/2016 @ 12:45 AM

Tags: blog, Puerto Rico

Photo Credit: Ana Martinez/Reuters

By: Luis Torres, LULAC National Director of Policy and Legislation

Last week brought a whirlwind of news on the topic of Puerto Rico. If you’ve been out of the loop, here are the basics. Puerto Rico is in major economic crisis. According to the House Natural Resources Committee, the committee that has jurisdiction over Puerto Rico matters in the U.S. House, Puerto Rico owes more than 70 billion dollars in debt in the form of bonds. In addition, it has a pension liability of 46 billion dollars (covered by only two billion dollars in net assets), unemployment is at 12 percent, and Puerto Ricans are fleeing the island in droves.

Bottom line, the island cannot make its debt payments and keep essential services funded.

Enter Washington, D.C.

Lawmakers on the Hill, under pressure from advocates, bond holders, and consumer groups, have been working on legislation that would provide Puerto Rico with additional options to address its current financial situation. However, the first draft of the legislation — leaked on the internet— got very mixed reviews. Bond holders balked at the idea of court facilitated debt restructuring, civil rights advocates and Puerto Rican politicians decried the oversight board that they say takes away Puerto Rico’s autonomy. The legislation did not seem to meet anyone’s expectations (a good summary of what’s in the legislation can be found here).

With the clock ticking on Puerto Rico’s pending debt payment on May 1st, and Congressional legislation at a standstill, the Puerto Rican government took matters into its own hands and decided to halt all debt payments and instead, use available funds to prioritize keeping essential public services running.

This set off a scramble by hedge funds holding Puerto Rican debt, who immediately filed lawsuits to freeze the assets of Puerto Rico and prevent the Puerto Rico Development Bank from making payments to local government agencies that need funds to keep services running.

So, now what?

The House Natural Resources Committee is expected to release an “updated” version of its Puerto Rico bill as early as today. Meanwhile Puerto Ricans, who are sticking it out on the island, are left in limbo.

At the end, it is unclear if the newest attempt to rewrite the Puerto Rico legislation will be enough to pass it through a skeptical House and Senate before the clock strikes midnight on May 1st when a 422 million dollar debt payment comes due.

Luis Torres is the Director of Policy and Legislation for the League of United Latin American Citizens. Prior to LULAC, he served as Legislative Director for Congressman Silvestre Reyes, former-Chairman of the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and was one of a handful of Latino Legislative Directors in the U.S. House of Representatives. Additionally, Torres also served as a high school teacher in Washington, D.C. as part of Teach for America. He received a Bachelor of Arts in Government and Sociology from Georgetown University, and a Master of Arts in Teaching from American University.

Connecting Cleveland at El Barrio

Posted on 04/09/2016 @ 12:45 AM

Tags: blog, technology, att

It’s hard to remember a time when we didn’t use the Internet to connect to the world around us. Connecting with friends, completing schoolwork, applying for jobs and many other activities are now done online. The connections that power these services are critical, which is why LULAC has partnered with AT&T to harness the power of the Internet by bringing state-of-the-art technology to community centers across the country.

On April 8, LULAC and AT&T re-launched the El Barrio Workforce Development Center in Cleveland. El Barrio was founded in 1990 to meet the needs of a growing Hispanic population on the near west side of Cleveland by two charismatic ministers who realized the need for helping people adjust to life in the Cleveland community. Today, the center employs more than 500 staff who reach more than 25,000 people annually and partners with leading hospitals, educational institutions and capacity-focused organizations to give as many people as possible the chance to build a better future.

Friday’s event was an opportunity to build on LULAC and AT&T’s commitment in the digital age– providing community organizations with 21st century technology equipment that will allow them to carry out their missions to connect users to a better future.

Through the AT&T Aspire program, AT&T has committed $350 million to helping give every child a high-quality education and their Nanodegree program launched with Udacity provides online, affordable, self-paced courses that teach skills for entry-level jobs in the tech industry.

LULAC, through its Empower Hispanic America with Technology program, is supporting a network of 60 community technology centers, providing free broadband access and computer-related training to students, parents, and low income individuals. The emphasis is to empower those without access to the Internet by providing that access and training them on using computers and the internet to do school work, college and financial aid searches, job training, job-searches, managing money, English language courses, and citizenship preparation courses.

While the event celebrated the introduction of this new technology to the center, it was also a time to discuss of the importance of technology in securing economic opportunity around the country, which FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel highlighted in her comments at the opening.

AT&T also supported Friday’s event in Cleveland with a training session for the center’s users on managing your digital footprint and using social media safely. The training was part of our Digital You program, created in collaboration with Common Sense Media that can help individuals with privacy, safety and security as you connect online through a series of educational modules provided through the program.

Today’s re-opening is a strong example of LULAC’s and AT&T’s commitment to advancing 21st century communications technology by making sure that technology is accessible.

Silencing Our Voice: Voter Suppression in the 2016 Election

Posted on 04/07/2016 @ 12:45 AM

Tags: blog

Photo Credit: Miguel Otarola/Cronkite News

By: Mark Salay, LULAC National Communications Intern

This year’s election gives way to a possibility of firsts for the country: the first Latino president, the first woman president, or the first Jewish president. But a first that hasn’t been addressed by the mainstream press is that this is the first presidential election since Shelby v. Holder gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

This has left millions of minority voters–including millions of Latinos–vulnerable to discrimination at the voting booth. We are left to ask if Latinos are truly being given an equal opportunity at casting a ballot this election season.

In the 2013 Supreme Court case Shelby v. Holder, the Court held that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. Section 4 determined which states and localities qualified to be under the jurisdiction of Section 5, which listed states and counties that had to go through preclearance, a process that required approval from the U.S. Justice Department to change voting requirements. Preclearance was targeted at eliminating disenfranchisement in regions with a history of voter discrimination.

Although the Court did not rule on Section 5, by ruling section 4 unconstitutional it essentially made Section 5 null. This gave states and counties with a history of voter discrimination power over deciding who gets to vote and who does not. Nine states, mostly concentrated in the South, and multiple counties in five different states were subject to preclearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

The consequences of this ruling has created an affront to democracy, as millions of voters can be potentially turned away at the polls because of strict voter ID laws, early voting cutbacks, and registration restrictions.

The effects of Shelby v. Holder were obvious in Arizona’s March 22 primary, which dissolved into a complete disaster. Voters in Maricopa County, the state’s largest and most diverse, had wait times as long as five hours because the county did away with 70 percent of polling places. Only 60 polling locations were in place, down from 200 in 2012 when Arizona was still monitored by an intact VRA. Arizona was one of nine states previously monitored by Section 5 because of its discriminatory record against Latino and Native American voters.

Even though lines stretched hundreds of people long after the 7 p.m. cutoff time, dedicated voters were undeterred. Aracely Calderon, an immigrant from Guatemala, was the last person in the state to cast her vote 12 minutes after midnight and after waiting in line for five hours.

“I’m going to go home very happy and satisfied because it really is a joy to be able to vote,” she told The Arizona Republic..

Minorities waiting in line longer to vote is not specific to Arizona. Hispanics report a wait time of more than 30 minutes, six times more often than White voters, and African Americans report extensive wait times four times more often than white voters.

In Texas, where strict voter ID laws have been in place since 2011, more than 600,000 registered voters do not have the appropriate ID required. Identification such as college IDs are not accepted, but handgun permits are. In March 2016, LULAC and Rep. Marc Veasy (D TX-33rd District) asked the U.S. Supreme Court in late-March to block Texas from enforcing its tough Voter ID laws for the general election, citing that a 2014 court decision upholding the tough identification policy is outdated and originally meant to be enforced only through the 2014 election.

Supporters of the restrictive voting laws in North Carolina charge that not having these policies will lead to the possibility of voter fraud. However, in that state there has been only two incidents of voter impersonation of the 35 million votes cast from 2000 to 2012.

Laws are currently in place to protect access to guns and products detrimental to health such as tobacco, yet there is a failure on the part of the U.S. Congress to protect one of the basic principles this country was founded on. It is immoral to try to win elections by preventing millions–usually the most vulnerable–from voting, especially since those advocating for stricter voting laws are the same elected officials who have failed to address the needs and demands of minority communities.

Not allowing minorities to have a say in the voting process will engender grave repercussions, especially within the Latino population. Resources will not be allocated to Latino communities if they cannot vote, leading to less investment in education, healthcare, affordable housing, and good paying jobs for Latinos. With the Latino demographic growing, this disparity in resources will affect the entire country’s economic and social landscape. Congressional leaders must implement policies to override the Court’s decision because any alternative is purely counterproductive.

Mark Salay is the Communications Intern at the LULAC National Office in Washington, D.C. He is a senior at the University of California, Santa Barbara, majoring in communication with minors in history and professional writing, and will be graduating in the Spring of 2016.


There are no comments.

Leave a Comment

Hide Formatting Help

You Type You See
*italics* italics
**bold** bold
+ item 1
+ item 2
+ item 3
  • item 1
  • item 2
  • item 3
> a really cool quote from a nice person
a really cool quote from a nice person

* Required information



Receive recent news from the League
of Latin American Citizens.

Become an eMember!